[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <005901cf9553$a5460f50$efd22df0$@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 10:41:10 -0700
From: "Weiming Zhao" <weimingz@...eaurora.org>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: AArch64 merge back
Hi Isaac,
So if I just want to use some arch-independent functions, then I just need
to build the main musl repo with aarch64 compiler. Is my understanding
correct?
Thanks,
Weiming
-----Original Message-----
From: Isaac Dunham [mailto:ibid.ag@...il.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 6:45 PM
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [musl] AArch64 merge back
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Weiming Zhao wrote:
> Hi Isaac,
>
> Do you mean those arch independent functions (e.g. abs, sprint,
> memcpy) have already been merged?
No, I was asking if you meant the whole port-in-progress or if you were only
asking about said functions; at that point I had not checked.
At present, I can tell you what the git log says:
-memcpy.c was last touched in August last year implementing a portable
optimized memcpy.
-abs.c has not changed in the 3 years of git history -sprintf.c (I assume
that's what you mean by 'sprint'?) has not been touched since 2012.
...all of which are before AArch64 porting.
Is the relevant code in 'rebase-1.0'?
Thanks,
Isaac Dunham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isaac Dunham [mailto:ibid.ag@...il.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 5:07 PM
> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> Subject: Re: [musl] AArch64 merge back
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:56:45PM -0700, Weiming Zhao wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm wondering if there is any plan to merge back the changes for
> > AArch64 from https://github.com/crxz0193/musl-aarch64 ?
> >
> > So we can stay on the main repository.
>
> What's the status of that? I see commits related to a few syscalls
> from the end of March/April 1, and nothing newer.
> The last news I heard, some of the work that would be needed was done,
> but I did not get the impression that it was possible to build working
> binaries, even static ones.
> (If this is incorrect, I'd like to hear the current status.)
>
> Some ports have been merged before all functionality worked (including
> the dynamic linker), but I don't recall seeing any ports get merged
> before it was possible to produce a working executable.
>
> Or are you referring to just the non-arch-specific changes?
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac Dunham
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
