|
Message-ID: <20140405015443.GU26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:54:43 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: build with clang-3.4 warnings report On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 03:06:03AM +0200, Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye wrote: > OK I was not building with --enable-warnings! Here is another round without bogus warnings you rejected: > -Wstring-plus-int > -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare > > Thanks, > awg > > src/aio/aio_readwrite.c:20:16: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] > .__si_fields.__sigchld.si_pid = __pthread_self()->pid, > ~^~~~~~~~~ > src/aio/aio_readwrite.c:18:20: note: previous initialization is here > .__si_fields.__rt.si_sigval = sev->sigev_value, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > src/aio/aio_readwrite.c:8:13: warning: function 'dummy' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] > static void dummy(void) > ^ > 2 warnings generated. Like I said before, this looks real, and we need to look into it. > src/env/__init_security.c:8:13: warning: function 'dummy' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] > static void dummy(void *ent) > ^ > 1 warning generated. This is a bug in the compiler; the function dummy has an externally visible alias, so it will not be omitted (and if it is actually omitted, that means the compiler is generating broken output). > src/env/__init_tls.c:46:14: warning: function 'simple' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] > static void *simple(void *p) > ^ > 1 warning generated. Thanks! This is a great find, cruft that was left behind in the lazy thread pointer init removal. Fixing it shaved ~40 bytes off the minimal static-linked program size, bringing the net change from the change down to near-zero if I'm not mistaken. :-) Our anti-bloat extremists will be very happy. > src/env/__libc_start_main.c:9:13: warning: function 'dummy' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] > static void dummy() {} > ^ > 1 warning generated. Another false positive. > In file included from src/errno/strerror.c:7: > src/errno/__strerror.h:100:1: warning: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'unsigned char' changes value from 1133 to 109 [-Wconstant-conversion] > 1133, > ^~~~ > 1 warning generated. Again, I'm confused why we're getting this one. > src/regex/regcomp.c:3123:18: warning: explicitly assigning a variable of type 'reg_errcode_t' (aka 'int') to itself [-Wself-assign] > do { errcode = errcode; if ( 1) goto error_exit; } while ( 0); > ~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~ This is gratuitous and comes from a macro expansion. The rest are more duplicates of the weak alias false positive (unused static functions). Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.