|
Message-ID: <20140316190608.GI26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:06:08 -0400 From: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: Last call for bugfixes for 1.0 On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 07:28:05PM +0100, Thomas Kreuzer wrote: > On 16.03.2014 16:25, Rich Felker wrote: > >Have you done analysis to determine that this has anything to do with > >musl's fgetln function? Short of that, I suspect it's just an ordinary > >crash in your fgetln. There's no reason they should be interfering; > >for static linking, if fgetln is already defined then musl's fgetln.o > >won't even get linked, and for dynamic linking, your symbol overrides > >and nothing else accesses musl's fgetln symbol > > As I said, if I just rename the function it works perfectly. But it > doesn't seem to be a problem of musl either. > Sorry for making the wrong call, the problem must be somewhere else > in my tool chain If you can make a self-contained example to reproduce the problem, I can take a look at it. Otherwise I don't know what I can do to help though, and my guess is still that it's not specifically caused my musl. Rich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.