[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5325ED35.3020106@rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:28:05 +0100
From: Thomas Kreuzer <tmkreuzer@...il.com>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Last call for bugfixes for 1.0
On 16.03.2014 16:25, Rich Felker wrote:
> Have you done analysis to determine that this has anything to do with
> musl's fgetln function? Short of that, I suspect it's just an ordinary
> crash in your fgetln. There's no reason they should be interfering;
> for static linking, if fgetln is already defined then musl's fgetln.o
> won't even get linked, and for dynamic linking, your symbol overrides
> and nothing else accesses musl's fgetln symbol
As I said, if I just rename the function it works perfectly. But it
doesn't seem to be a problem of musl either.
Sorry for making the wrong call, the problem must be somewhere else in
my tool chain
regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
