[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6f63fdcfff3745066c8776def00f9ad@10.1.1.2>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:07:34 +0100
From: Christian Wiese <chris@...nsde.net>
To: <musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: linux/netlink.h
Hi John,
> imo a good alternative to downloading the full kernel sources to compile
> the headers.
> an additional advantage is that kernel headers are often broken,
> the version used by sabotage is known good.
I am curious about what you mean by "kernel headers are often broken".
I am also building custom linux based systems, and I have no problems
using
the corresponding kernel headers for the kernel version I am building.
It would be interesting for me to know what brokeness you experienced in
the
kernel headers.
I already checked the documentation provided by the cross-lfs project, and
it
seems that they do not seem to have issues using the corresponding kernel
headers for the kernel version they use.
Cheers,
Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
