[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51618818.9080002@barfooze.de>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:52:08 +0200
From: John Spencer <maillist-musl@...fooze.de>
To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Building libc separately from libm,librt,libpthread and
others
On 04/07/2013 04:43 PM, Timerlan Moldobaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please help with reducing the size of statically linked libc.a
> library ?
> Whereas the comparison table located in
> http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html
> claims the size of complete .a set as 333k, I got around 2M while building
> the library on x86_64 with gcc version 4.1.1.
the comparison page also notes that it is using size(1) and not filesize.
> I suppose that might be caused by including in libc.a object files that
> belong to libm, librt, libpthread and others.
> Am I right ?
> Is there any way to compile libc.a solely ?
the only thing that can theoretically be left away is libm, but this
would need some effort.
things like pthread support are fundamental to musl's inner workings, so
they can not be left away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
