Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120502120413.GA17238@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:04:13 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:51:03PM +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
> > Received-SPF: pass SPF=MAILFROM; sender=musl-return-788-gf=unixsol.org@...ts.openwall.com; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org;
...
> > Received-SPF: fail SPF=FROM; sender=gf@...xsol.org; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org;
> 
> The last line was the problem. Since openwall lists are sending the email
> as me as sender, my spf checks fail. I have checks for X-Mailing-Lists header
> but since ezmlm sets Mailing-List the checks fail. The problem is on my side.
> I have fixed it, sorry for the noise.

Oh, so you were checking not only envelope-from, but also header From.
In case someone else does that too, I've just relaxed the SPF record to
use "?all" instead of "-all".

Thanks, and sorry for the noise.

Alexander

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.