|
Message-ID: <20120502120413.GA17238@openwall.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 16:04:13 +0400 From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> To: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org> Cc: musl@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9 On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 02:51:03PM +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote: > > Received-SPF: pass SPF=MAILFROM; sender=musl-return-788-gf=unixsol.org@...ts.openwall.com; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; ... > > Received-SPF: fail SPF=FROM; sender=gf@...xsol.org; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org; > > The last line was the problem. Since openwall lists are sending the email > as me as sender, my spf checks fail. I have checks for X-Mailing-Lists header > but since ezmlm sets Mailing-List the checks fail. The problem is on my side. > I have fixed it, sorry for the noise. Oh, so you were checking not only envelope-from, but also header From. In case someone else does that too, I've just relaxed the SPF record to use "?all" instead of "-all". Thanks, and sorry for the noise. Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.