[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA11FA7.1030905@unixsol.org>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:51:03 +0300
From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
To: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
CC: musl@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9
Around 05/02/2012 02:08 PM, Solar Designer scribbled:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:54:20PM +0300, Georgi Chorbadzhiyski wrote:
>> Sorry for asking the second time, I was unable to find my first e-mail /it
>> has gone to Junk folder because of failed SPF/. Again, sorry.
>
> Why did it fail SPF? Is this anything with the list setup?
>
> I think we have the proper SPF record for lists.openwall.com:
>
> $ host -t txt lists.openwall.com
> lists.openwall.com descriptive text "v=spf1 mx ip4:195.42.179.200 -all"
>
> Do you possibly use SPF along with mail forwarding from another address
> of yours? (This is a fundamental problem of SPF.)
Here are the headers that I received on the last email that I have sent to
the ML:
> Received: from mother.openwall.net ([::ffff:195.42.179.200])
> by ns.unixsol.org with SMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:32 +0300
> id 0000000000144123.4FA10458.00007834
> Received-SPF: none SPF=HELO; sender=mother.openwall.net; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org;
> Received-SPF: pass SPF=MAILFROM; sender=musl-return-788-gf=unixsol.org@...ts.openwall.com; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org;
> Received: (qmail 29787 invoked by uid 550); 2 May 2012 09:54:32 -0000
> Mailing-List: contact musl-help@...ts.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Post: <mailto:musl@...ts.openwall.com>
> List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@...ts.openwall.com>
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com>
> List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@...ts.openwall.com>
> Reply-To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> Delivered-To: mailing list musl@...ts.openwall.com
> Received: (qmail 29778 invoked from network); 2 May 2012 09:54:31 -0000
> Message-ID: <4FA1044C.90406@...xsol.org>
> Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 12:54:20 +0300
> From: Georgi Chorbadzhiyski <gf@...xsol.org>
> Organization: Unix Solutions Ltd. (http://unixsol.org)
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/11.0
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: musl@...ts.openwall.com
> CC: Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
> References: <20120424003111.GN14673@...ghtrain.aerifal.cx> <4FA10332.603@...xsol.org>
> In-Reply-To: <4FA10332.603@...xsol.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: Re: [musl] Current status vs 1.0 wishlist, 0.9
> Received-SPF: fail SPF=FROM; sender=gf@...xsol.org; remoteip=::ffff:195.42.179.200; remotehost=; helo=mother.openwall.net; receiver=ns.unixsol.org;
The last line was the problem. Since openwall lists are sending the email
as me as sender, my spf checks fail. I have checks for X-Mailing-Lists header
but since ezmlm sets Mailing-List the checks fail. The problem is on my side.
I have fixed it, sorry for the noise.
--
Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
http://georgi.unixsol.org/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
