[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230703181659.la7gx5nx4qar6r2v@jwilk.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 20:16:59 +0200
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@...lk.net>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@...ucla.edu>
CC: "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@...cox-tech.com>, <libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com>,
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@...hat.com>, Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
<linux-man@...r.kernel.org>, <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
<musl@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [musl] Re: Re: regression in man pages for
interfaces using loff_t
>-This format is employed in cases where only a single
>-feature test macro can be used to expose the function
>-declaration, and that macro is not defined by default.
>+This format is employed in cases where feature macros
>+expose the function declaration with the correct type,
>+and these macros are not defined by default.
This isn't right. The shorthand format is sometimes used when there's no
off(64)_t involved, e.g. in memfd_create(2).
--
Jakub Wilk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
