Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <177D39A7-F50F-4DD1-84D1-244E7888D439@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:04:47 -0700
From: Guy Harris <gharris@...ic.net>
To: enh <enh@...gle.com>
Cc: Time zone mailing list <tz@...a.org>, libc-coord@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [tz] thread-safe localtime() for an arbitrary
 timezone

On Jun 20, 2023, at 11:27 PM, Guy Harris via tz <tz@...a.org> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 2023, at 2:00 PM, enh via tz <tz@...a.org> wrote:
> 
>> it's actually the openbsd strptime.c that's unhappy:
>> ```
>> In file included from bionic/libc/tzcode/strptime.c:40:
> 
> I see the string "bionic" rather than "openbsd" there, so that appears to be *Bionic's* strptime.c that's unhappy.  Is there a requirement that Bionic's strptime.c be unchanged from OpenBSD's?

In fact, the openbsd strptime.c, as of CVS revision 1.32:

	https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/lib/libc/time/strptime.c?rev=1.31&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

does *not* contain the line

	typedef struct state *timezone_t;

so it appears that it's the *Bionic* strptime.c that's unhappy.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.