|
Message-ID: <20200727095306.7f369949@oasis.local.home> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:53:06 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/trace: Remove function callback casts On Sun, 26 Jul 2020 17:52:42 +0200 Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com> wrote: > > If I try to do this I will need some help. Some info that point me to the > > right direction would be greatly appreciated. Some advice about what > > functions I will need to implement would be really helpfull. Or point me > > to the right piece of code that I can pick as base point. > > I've been searching and reading the code as much as possible. I've found > two patches that I think can be useful to guide me. One [1] adds support > for ftrace_ops to the riscv architecture. The other one [2] adds support > for ftrace_ops to the parisc architecture. > > [1] commit 71e736a7d655 ("riscv/ftrace: Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS support") > [2] commit d562aca37a54 ("parisc/ftrace: Add ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS support") > > Due to powerpc arch calls the needed functions from assembly, I based my > idea on the patch for the RISCV arch. > > Can something like the following work? > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h > index bc76970b6ee5..1c51ff5afae1 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ftrace.h > @@ -61,9 +61,8 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace { > }; > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > > -#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS > #define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1 > -#endif > + > #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */ > > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S > index e023ae59c429..e69a4e945986 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_32.S > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_caller) > MCOUNT_SAVE_FRAME > /* r3 ends up with link register */ > subi r3, r3, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE > + > + /* Set ftrace_ops (r5) to the global variable function_trace_op */ > + /* Set pt_regs (r6) to NULL */ > + > .globl ftrace_call > ftrace_call: > bl ftrace_stub > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S > index 6708e24db0ab..a741448b1df9 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_pg.S > @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ _GLOBAL_TOC(ftrace_caller) > std r3, 128(r1) > ld r4, 16(r11) > subi r3, r3, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE > + > + /* Set ftrace_ops (r5) to the global variable function_trace_op */ > + /* Set pt_regs (r6) to NULL */ I'm guessing you are going to do the above here. If so, this looks correct. > + > .globl ftrace_call > ftrace_call: > bl ftrace_stub > > To add support for ftrace_ops to the powerpc architecture is only necessary > to fill the r5 and r6 registers before the call to ftrace_stub in all the > cases. The register r5 is a pointer to ftrace_ops struct and the register > r6 is a pointer to pt_regs struct. These registers are the third and fourth > parameters of a function with the following prototype. The first and second > ones are yet set. I guess you mean that the first and second ones are already set. But, yeah, you are on the correct path here! > > void func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip, > struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs); > > Am I in the right direction? or am I totally wrong? No, you don't look wrong. But the true test is to try it out :-) Don't forget to update ftrace_32.S as well. > > Thanks for your time and patience. My pleasure. Thanks for doing this. The more people that understand all this, the better! -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.