|
Message-ID: <CABgxDo+FSk0Tkvu=uFd5tjd+6TnnkwxwrP1a0QLBSkhhJ4CqUw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 10:15:50 +0200 From: Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Shyam Saini <mayhs11saini@...il.com> Subject: Re: refactor tasklets to avoid unsigned long argument Le lun. 22 juil. 2019 à 19:19, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> a écrit : > > On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 07:55:33PM +0200, Romain Perier wrote: > > Ok, thanks for these explanations. > > (Reminder: please use inline-context email replies instead of > top-posting, this makes threads much easier to read.) Arf, good point. My bad :) > > > Looks good! I wonder if you're able to use Coccinelle to generate the > conversion patch? There appear to be just under 400 callers of > tasklet_init(), which is a lot to type by hand. :) Mmmhhh, I did not thought *at all* to coccinelle for this, good idea. I am gonna to read some docs about the tool > > Also, have you found any other tasklet users that are NOT using > tasklet_init()? The timer_struct conversion had about three ways > to do initialization. :( This is what I was looking before you give me details about the task. It seems, there is only one way to init a tasklet. I have just re-checked, it seems ok. Thanks for your feedbacks, Regards, Romain
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.