|
Message-ID: <2286764.GK92XWVYGX@tauon.chronox.de> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:52:29 +0100 From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de> To: Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ctr: avoid VLA use Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2018, 14:46:29 CET schrieb Salvatore Mesoraca: Hi Salvatore, > 2018-03-14 14:31 GMT+01:00 Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>: > > Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2018, 14:17:30 CET schrieb Salvatore Mesoraca: > > > > Hi Salvatore, > > > >> if (walk.nbytes) { > >> > >> - crypto_ctr_crypt_final(&walk, child); > >> - err = blkcipher_walk_done(desc, &walk, 0); > >> + err = crypto_ctr_crypt_final(&walk, child); > >> + err = blkcipher_walk_done(desc, &walk, err); > > > > I guess you either want to handle the error from crypto_ctr_crypt_final or > > do an err |= blkcipher_walk_done. > > I think that blkcipher_walk_done handles and returns the error for me. > Am I wrong? You are right as you want to finalize the crypto operation even though the encryption fails. Please disregard my comment. > > Best regards, > > Salvatore Ciao Stephan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.