|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKwWRzK8EJOo2zraxi9ghQ7an5d4yr8ktGa+ijWX_aJZA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:18:46 -0800 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com> Cc: Andreas Christoforou <andreaschristofo@...il.com>, Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ipv6: xfrm6_state: remove VLA usage On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 09:40:44 +0200 > Andreas Christoforou <andreaschristofo@...il.com> wrote: > >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c >> index b15075a..270a53a 100644 >> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c >> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c >> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ __xfrm6_sort(void **dst, void **src, int n, int (*cmp)(void *p), int maxclass) >> { >> int i; >> int class[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH]; >> - int count[maxclass]; >> + int count[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH]; >> >> memset(count, 0, sizeof(count)); > > Can you perhaps initialize 'count' instead of calling memset(), now? Do you mean: int count[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH] = { }; instead of the memset()? I thought the compiler would resolve these both to the same thing? The former looks better though! :) -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.