|
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+ZQbfc8AMmkuNJxyMtQX5oJYN6Cs52_8vvGLJQqSpkkA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:32:26 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] bug: Clarify help text for BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> wrote: >> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug >> index 77fadface4f9..5ac4d1148385 100644 >> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug >> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug >> @@ -1998,9 +1998,12 @@ config BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION >> > bool "Trigger a BUG when data corruption is detected" >> > select DEBUG_LIST >> > help >> > - Select this option if the kernel should BUG when it encounters >> > - data corruption in kernel memory structures when they get checked >> > - for validity. >> > + This option enables several inexpensive data corruption checks. >> > + Most of these checks normally just WARN and try to further avoid >> + the corruption. Selecting this option upgrades these to BUGs so > > First it says it enables some checks, but here it says it upgrades them > to BUGs which seems inconsistent. Right, it does both. It uses Kconfig "select" to enable checks, and raises checks from WARN to BUG. > >> + that the offending process is killed. Additionally, the system >> + owner can furhter configure the system for immediate reboots > > "further" Ah, thanks! > >> + (via panic_on_oops sysctl) or crash dumps. >> >> > If unsure, say N. >> -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.