|
Message-ID: <CALCETrX1RpjZxdo1aauQa8hGQPO1Dzn5gU6NoT1CvSKo8ea1uQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:20:24 -0800 From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] syscalls: Restore address limit after a syscall On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 01:38:41PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote: >> This patch prevents a syscall to modify the address limit of the >> caller. The address limit is kept by the syscall wrapper and restored >> just after the syscall ends. > > I would much rather architectures were given the opportunity to code up > checks like this efficiently (iow, inline in the exit path assembly), > rather than having to unconditionally call an additional function on > every syscall, with its register saving overheads. > Me too. I think the two config choices should be: (a) BUG_ON(!segment_eq(...)); (b) No generic check at all -- arch code will handle it --Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.