|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1703082256480.23532@knanqh.ubzr> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:46 +0100 (CET) From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> To: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com> cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, René Nyffenegger <mail@...enyffenegger.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Stanislav Kinsburskiy <skinsbursky@...tuozzo.com>, Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Implement specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state for user-mode > returns for arm. > --- > Based on next-20170308 > --- > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig > index 0d4e71b42c77..704fd8f197fa 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ config ARM > select ARCH_HAVE_CUSTOM_GPIO_H > select ARCH_HAS_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL > select ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_PC_PARPORT > + select ARCH_NO_SYSCALL_VERIFY_PRE_USERMODE_STATE > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX if ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX > select ARCH_OPTIONAL_KERNEL_RWX_DEFAULT if CPU_V7 > select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S > index eb5cd77bf1d8..80cfdc7fabde 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S > @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ > ret_fast_syscall: > UNWIND(.fnstart ) > UNWIND(.cantunwind ) > + push {r0} @ save returned r0 > + bl verify_pre_usermode_state > + pop {r0} @ restore r0 > disable_irq_notrace @ disable interrupts > ldr r1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] @ re-check for syscall tracing > tst r1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK | _TIF_WORK_MASK This feature is configurable, right? Here the branch overhead is imposed even if the feature is configured out. You should consider conditionally defining a macro like some other features do. Furthermore I think we still support old toolchains that don't know what push and pop mean. You should use the legacy syntax instead. Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.