[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170216123253.GB588@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:32:53 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: consistently check object sizes
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:05:57PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> In commit 76624175dcae ("arm64: uaccess: consistently check object sizes"),
> the object size checks are moved outside the access_ok() so that bad
> destinations are detected before hitting the "memset(dest, 0, size)" in the
> copy_from_user() failure path.
>
> This makes the same change for arm, with attention given to possibly
> extracting the uaccess routines into a common header file for all
> architectures in the future.
I take it here you're referring to aligning on the __arch_* naming for
primitives manging arch-specific state and performing the copies. It
might be worth calling that out explicitly, since it likely isn't
obvious to others.
It may also be worth calling out that this also means we can now do the
checks for !MMU, which we couldn't do before.
The patch itself looks sane to me, so FWIW:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Thanks,
Mark.
> Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 1f59ea051bab..b7e0125c0bbf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -478,11 +478,10 @@ extern unsigned long __must_check
> arm_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n);
>
> static inline unsigned long __must_check
> -__copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> +__arch_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> {
> unsigned int __ua_flags;
>
> - check_object_size(to, n, false);
> __ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
> n = arm_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> uaccess_restore(__ua_flags);
> @@ -495,18 +494,15 @@ extern unsigned long __must_check
> __copy_to_user_std(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
>
> static inline unsigned long __must_check
> -__copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +__arch_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> {
> #ifndef CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY
> unsigned int __ua_flags;
> -
> - check_object_size(from, n, true);
> __ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
> n = arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> uaccess_restore(__ua_flags);
> return n;
> #else
> - check_object_size(from, n, true);
> return arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> #endif
> }
> @@ -526,25 +522,49 @@ __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
> }
>
> #else
> -#define __copy_from_user(to, from, n) (memcpy(to, (void __force *)from, n), 0)
> -#define __copy_to_user(to, from, n) (memcpy((void __force *)to, from, n), 0)
> +#define __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n) \
> + (memcpy(to, (void __force *)from, n), 0)
> +#define __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n) \
> + (memcpy((void __force *)to, from, n), 0)
> #define __clear_user(addr, n) (memset((void __force *)addr, 0, n), 0)
> #endif
>
> -static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> +static inline unsigned long __must_check
> +__copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> +{
> + check_object_size(to, n, false);
> + return __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long __must_check
> +copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
> {
> unsigned long res = n;
> +
> + check_object_size(to, n, false);
> +
> if (likely(access_ok(VERIFY_READ, from, n)))
> - res = __copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> + res = __arch_copy_from_user(to, from, n);
> if (unlikely(res))
> memset(to + (n - res), 0, res);
> return res;
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +static inline unsigned long __must_check
> +__copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> {
> + check_object_size(from, n, true);
> +
> + return __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned long __must_check
> +copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +{
> + check_object_size(from, n, true);
> +
> if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
> - n = __copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> + n = __arch_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
> return n;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
