|
Message-ID: <20170210144130.GP10893@dhcp22.suse.cz> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:41:30 +0100 From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> To: Hoeun Ryu <hoeun.ryu@...il.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fork: free vmapped stacks in cache when cpus are offline On Fri 10-02-17 23:31:41, Hoeun Ryu wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Fri 10-02-17 17:32:07, Hoeun Ryu wrote: [...] > >> static unsigned long *alloc_thread_stack_node(struct task_struct *tsk, int node) > >> @@ -456,6 +474,11 @@ void __init fork_init(void) > >> for (i = 0; i < UCOUNT_COUNTS; i++) { > >> init_user_ns.ucount_max[i] = max_threads/2; > >> } > >> + > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > >> + cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "vm_stack_cache", > >> + NULL, free_vm_stack_cache); > >> +#endif > > > > I am not familiar the new hotplug infrastructure so I might be missing > > something. CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN will allocate a state which is has only > > 30 slots available. The name also suggests this will be called on an > > online event. Why doesn't this have its own state like other users. The > > name should also reflect offline event CPUHP_STACK_CACHE_DEAD or > > something like that. > > I'll define CPUHP_VMSTACK_CACHE_DEAD before CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN in > cpuhotplug.h. > Do you think the change is made in a separate patch or not ? I think it should be in a single patch. I am not sure what are the rules to define a new state though. Let's CC Thomas. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.