[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161013143159.GA3525@thigreal>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 17:31:59 +0300
From: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] Add architecture
independent hardened atomic base
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:50:12PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Reshetova, Elena
> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> > Yes, same story, now we are not calling it, but things change obviously. We wanted to start somewhere, and this set is already quite big even with the current needs.
> > So, does everyone agree that we should provide full coverage?
>
> I think it makes sense. That means no one wanting the function ends up
> with a surprise depending on CONFIG selection, etc.
>
Yes, sounds reasonable, I will get started on this tomorrow.
Once I get that sorted I'll also check on our lkdtm coverage, since I'm pretty
sure it's somewhat spotty even before any new implementations.
Best Regards,
-hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
