[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+X4TkaZN2pQseWKBAjbirF06aUMjGqZ2La3ODGutFf8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:50:12 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Cc: Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>, David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/13] Add architecture
independent hardened atomic base
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Reshetova, Elena
<elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> Yes, same story, now we are not calling it, but things change obviously. We wanted to start somewhere, and this set is already quite big even with the current needs.
> So, does everyone agree that we should provide full coverage?
I think it makes sense. That means no one wanting the function ends up
with a surprise depending on CONFIG selection, etc.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Nexus Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
