|
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1608151058250.25028@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:00:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com> cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, "xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] arm64: xen: Enable user access before a privcmd hvc call On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Catalin, > > I have CCed Stefano who is maintaining the Xen ARM code in Linux. > > On 12/08/2016 17:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Privcmd calls are issued by the userspace. The kernel needs to enable > > access to TTBR0_EL1 as the hypervisor would issue stage 1 translations > > to user memory via AT instructions. Since AT instructions are not > > affected by the PAN bit (ARMv8.1), we only need the explicit > > uaccess_enable/disable if the TTBR0 PAN option is enabled. > > > > Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> > > Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com> > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> > > Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com> > > Regards, > > > --- > > arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S b/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S > > index 329c8027b0a9..4c509f4f4dcc 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S > > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S > > @@ -91,6 +91,24 @@ ENTRY(privcmd_call) > > mov x2, x3 > > mov x3, x4 > > mov x4, x5 > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_TTBR0_PAN > > + /* > > + * Privcmd calls are issued by the userspace. The kernel needs to > > + * enable access to TTBR0_EL1 as the hypervisor would issue stage 1 > > + * translations to user memory via AT instructions. Since AT > > + * instructions are not affected by the PAN bit (ARMv8.1), we only > > + * need the explicit uaccess_enable/disable if the TTBR0 PAN option is > > + * enabled. That's a pity but it is how it is. Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org> Given that the patch is part of your PAN series, I expect that it is going to go via your tree. > > + uaccess_enable x6, x7, x8 > > +#endif > > hvc XEN_IMM > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_TTBR0_PAN > > + /* > > + * Disable userspace access from kernel once the hyp call completed. > > + */ > > + uaccess_disable x6 > > +#endif > > ret > > ENDPROC(privcmd_call); > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > > > -- > Julien Grall >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.