[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+0RryPNbSeEYcn6o9zTqz4DKZV3XCuRVuus_X9oUfmww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:55:54 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] mm: Hardened usercopy
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com> wrote:
>> On 07/15/2016 02:44 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> +static inline const char *check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned
>>> long n,
>>> + bool to_user)
>>> +{
>>> + struct page *page, *endpage;
>>> + const void *end = ptr + n - 1;
>>> +
>>> + if (!virt_addr_valid(ptr))
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>
>>
>> virt_addr_valid returns true on vmalloc addresses on arm64 which causes some
>> intermittent false positives (tab completion in a qemu buildroot environment
>> was showing it fairly reliably). I think this is an arm64 bug because
>> virt_addr_valid should return true if and only if virt_to_page returns the
>> corresponding page. We can work around this for now by explicitly
>> checking against is_vmalloc_addr.
>
> Hrm, that's weird. Sounds like a bug too, but I'll add a check for
> is_vmalloc_addr() to catch it for now.
BTW, if you were testing against -next, KASAN moved things around in
copy_*_user() in a way I wasn't expecting (__copy* and copy* now both
call __arch_copy* instead of copy* calling __copy*). I'll have this
fixed in the next version.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
