[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160502195903.8a07c51ebf1cce1c0a1ccd6f@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 19:59:03 +0200
From: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
To: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, Linux Kbuild mailing
list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>, PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>, Brad
Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Kees
Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Brown
<david.brown@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] GCC plugin infrastructure
On Mon, 2 May 2016 14:07:35 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
Hi,
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > index 253b72e..f912316 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/Makefile
> > @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ CFL := $(PROFILING) -mcmodel=small -fPIC -O2 -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -m64 \
> > -fno-omit-frame-pointer -foptimize-sibling-calls \
> > -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING -DBUILD_VDSO
> >
> > -$(vobjs): KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(CFL)
> > +$(vobjs): KBUILD_CFLAGS := $(filter-out $(GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS),$(KBUILD_CFLAGS)) $(CFL)
> >
> > #
> > # vDSO code runs in userspace and -pg doesn't help with profiling anyway.
> > @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out -m64,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS))
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out -mcmodel=kernel,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32))
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out -fno-pic,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32))
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out -mfentry,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32))
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out $(GCC_PLUGINS_CFLAGS),$(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32))
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += -m32 -msoft-float -mregparm=0 -fpic
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector)
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 += $(call cc-option, -foptimize-sibling-calls)
>
>
> Looks like gcc-plugins should be omitted only for this directory.
> Please tell me why.
> I am not familiar with x86 architecture, so this is not clear to me.
The vdso is userland code so in general kernel instrumentation/analysis doesn't apply to it.
--
Emese
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
