[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56CCD677.1316.1C5E89E6@pageexec.freemail.hu>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:00:23 +0100
From: "PaX Team" <pageexec@...email.hu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lkdtm: add test for executing .rodata
On 23 Feb 2016 at 12:53, Kees Cook wrote:
> I prefer using all the "regular" mechanisms so that I really know I'm
> exercising the actual case I want to be testing. (i.e. I don't want to
> bypass the linker.)
>
> If only there were some way to filter gcc output, like with plugins. ;)
plugins can set/override section flags, initify and constify both do in
fact but i guess that's little help for your generic case that has to
work without them as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
