[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120302160305.c51a02c9fa5b11e191cd80e4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:03:05 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Indan Zupancic" <indan@....nu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Kees Cook"
<keescook@...omium.org>, "Will Drewry" <wad@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, pmoore@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org, coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] sk_run_filter: add support for custom
load_pointer
Just a note.
On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:04:41 +0100 "Indan Zupancic" <indan@....nu> wrote:
>
> On Fri, March 2, 2012 02:19, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > That assumes that we're going to merge this stuff into 3.4 - if we
> > don't, unwrecker gets rewrecked and grumpy.
> >
> > I don't know if we're going to merge it into 3.4? I haven't been
> > paying a lot of attention and haven't looked at the patches in a while.
>
> I think it should be merged, but I think 3.5 is probably better.
If it is going into v3.5, I don't want to add it to linux-next until after
v3.4-rc1 is out, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
