[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120302145750.41b96e8be011a9a73c4fedf7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:57:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rdunlap@...otime.net, mcgrathr@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@....edu, eparis@...hat.com, serge.hallyn@...onical.com,
djm@...drot.org, scarybeasts@...il.com, indan@....nu, pmoore@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, eric.dumazet@...il.com, markus@...omium.org,
coreyb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/13] sk_run_filter: add support for custom
load_pointer
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:41:51 -0600 Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> No explicit dependency. It's just a conflict in how ptrace options
> are set, defined, and masked (and STOP being renumbered). Other than
> the ptrace changes, the whole series patches cleanly onto both trees.
> The resolved version is less code and easier to read, so I don't
> suspect it'll be a challenge at all.
OK, so we need a tree based on Linus' (like v3.3-rc5 or something - and
preferably tested ;-)) and an explicit request to me to include that tree.
I will sort out any conflicts with Andrews's tree and post the fixups I
make so others can correct me if necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
