[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316025701.4478.65.camel@nimitz>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:41:41 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Al Viro
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: restrict access to /proc/slabinfo
On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 20:41 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> @@ -4584,7 +4584,8 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_slabstats_operations = {
>
> static int __init slab_proc_init(void)
> {
> - proc_create("slabinfo",S_IWUSR|S_IRUGO,NULL,&proc_slabinfo_operations);
> + proc_create("slabinfo", S_IWUSR | S_IRUSR, NULL,
> + &proc_slabinfo_operations);
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK
> proc_create("slab_allocators", 0, NULL, &proc_sla
If you respin this, please don't muck with the whitespace. Otherwise,
I'm fine with this. Distros are already starting to do this anyway in
userspace.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
-- Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
