|
Message-ID: <CABtNtWFHcAZw1uuBOt+0yXyjX9cWnifztDdZKK2Wy123OtwKkA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:13:34 +0800 From: Kai Zhao <loverszhao@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: auditing our use of FMT_* flags (was: more robustness) Hi Alexander, On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote: > Kai, magnum - > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:34:31PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote: >> If FMT_8_BIT means that the 8th bit sometimes matters, even if rarely >> and even if behavior may vary across systems (so JtR's attempts to crack >> such passwords would not necessarily match the target system's behavior >> and thus might not help), then we should set it, with a comment on why. > > I've just committed a fix like that: > > http://cvsweb.openwall.com/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/Owl/packages/john/john/src/trip_fmt.c.diff?r1=1.19;r2=1.20 > Should we commit this to jumbo ? Currently, tripcode of jumbo does not set FMT_8_BIT. Thanks, Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.