|
Message-ID: <20150726205846.GA2077@openwall.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:58:47 +0300 From: Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Re: ztex 1.15y boards, pre-development On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 08:51:42PM +0200, Katja Malvoni wrote: > On 26 July 2015 at 20:12, Aleksey Cherepanov <lyosha@...nwall.com> wrote: > > > > But for me, it segfaulted first several runs and then it fails on every > > run: > > > > S[0][0] = 0xd1310ba6 0xd131f12c <<< failure > > S[0][1] = 0x98dfb5ac 0x98dfb5ac ok > > S[0][2] = 0x2ffd72db 0x2ffd72db ok > > S[0][3] = 0xd01adfb7 0xd01adfb7 ok > > S[0][4] = 0xb8e1afed 0xb8e1afed ok > > S[0][5] = 0x6a267e96 0x6a267e96 ok > > S[0][6] = 0xba7c9045 0xba7c9045 ok > > S[0][7] = 0xf12c7f99 0xf12c7f99 ok > > > > Hm... this looks like first word written by FPGA is the last one from the > previous read/write cycle (0xf12c). And it's not the same problem as I get > on my board :( I think I can reproduce your problem too: I changed integers sent[2] += 9; I tried various timings, including pause between write and read: it takes 5 runs to get new value back. (It does not affect the first word.) So first 4 runs of 5 give: S[0][0] = 0xd1310ba6 0xd131f12c <<< failure S[0][1] = 0x98dfb5ac 0x98dfb5ac ok S[0][2] = 0x2ffd72e3 0x2ffd72e4 <<< failure S[0][3] = 0xd01adfb7 0xd01adfb7 ok [...] then there is only the first failure. Thanks! -- Regards, Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.