[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABob6ipAtH-U0cWqbxto-2uC4BvT-4RJ7HJkWCnox0CQqTa-og@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:59:04 +0200
From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: PHC: Parallel in OpenCL
2015-06-02 22:03 GMT+02:00 Agnieszka Bielec <bielecagnieszka8@...il.com>:
> [a@...er run]$ ./john --test --format=parallel-opencl --dev=1 --skip-self-test
> Speed for cost 1 (s) of 0, cost 2 (p) of 0
> Many salts: 28493 c/s real, 3276K c/s virtual
> Only one salt: 28493 c/s real, 3276K c/s virtual
Ok, at least it is clear now that we have lost 1000 c/s by splitting kernel.
Maybe we could limit code size by using gotos, but it would be a stunt
and I don't recomend it.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
