[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ecdd2392cb7f47a8118f06052366cca@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:05:59 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: popular binary_hash_*
On 11 Jun, 2013, at 21:51 , Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> wrote:
> 2013/6/10 magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>:
>> This is coalesced and out of order so shared functions can't be used.
>>
>> These have some sort of GPU-side comparison.
>
> Sure, just wanted to let you know :)
>
>>> Some of the formats had debug info inside binary_hash_0 function, I
>>> left them as is.
>>
>> We might want to add debug code to the shared functions instead.
>
> Somehow I am not convinced to this idea.
>
> Attached patch for the rest, thanks for help with this,
> Lukas
> <common_binary_hash_N_final.diff>
Your changes to DES, BSDI and LM broke them for some builds. I just reverted those. Be very careful when changing core files!
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
