|
Message-ID: <CABob6irHsZP9fGna54L1-1BySyoWChobT_4bBecEAnDxKVuekg@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 23:22:12 +0200 From: Lukas Odzioba <lukas.odzioba@...il.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: sha3-opencl 2013/6/2 Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>: > Lukas, Dhiru, Daniel - > > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 10:08:40PM +0200, Lukas Odzioba wrote: >> Please try to create a new format sha3-opencl for JtR. Seems that Dhiru used better name for it: raw-keccak-256, so let it be raw-keccak-256-opencl instead of sha3-opencl. > Let's not forget that strictly speaking there's no SHA-3 yet. We know > it will be Keccak, but we don't know the details reliably yet. The > Wikipedia page on SHA-3 is still careful enough to give the test vectors > for four flavors of "Keccak" and not "SHA-3". > > So let's call it Keccak and not SHA-3 in JtR for now. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHA-3 > > "As of May 2013, NIST has not yet updated Secure Hash Standard (SHS) for > SHA-3. Content of this article are subject to change once the final > standard is published (draft expected 2013 Q3, final - 2014 Q2)." You're right, I wasn't aware of that. > "Note: Pending the standardization of SHA-3, there is no specification > of particular SHA-3 functions yet." > > Lukas - please make sure Daniel does not over-spend time on this task, > since his main GSoC project is different. I'll keep an eye on it. Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.