[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+TsHUDtUL6j3Pa_wxLgs-+0op5ZD9=xX08WMx_N91O9vNqjPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:56:44 +0530
From: Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Mulit-gpu using claudio's interfaces
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Sayantan Datta <std2048@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Claudio,magnum,
>
> I think I am not on the same page as everyone else regarding the
> ocl_gpu_id and device_id in common-opencl.h.
>
> Caludio, I see you have provided two functions to translate the sequential
> id(s) to platform and device id(s). But I guess the
> devices[],ques[],contexts[],program[] are indexed by ocl_gpu_id ,right ? If
> so you don't seem to have provided any function to transform the sequential
> id(s) to ocl_gpu_id. Am I supposed to calculate that internally in the
> format ? If yes, then please provide the math.
>
> Also I see that the -device option begins from 0. I think Frank and magnum
> suggested it should start from 1. Anyways, it is not a big issue I guess.
>
> Regards,
> Sayantan
>
Okay ,I think I've got it. It is the ocl_device_list[] which maps directly
to gpu_id right ?
Regards,
Sayantan
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
