[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <890214eec82b42863f44b1ed590f89e9@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:03:11 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Add --list=hidden-options hint to usage output
On 17 Jan, 2013, at 22:59 , Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com> wrote:
> Now that the number of hidden options is similar to the number of
> "regular" options, what about the attached patch?
>
> Basically, it adds "see --list=hidden-options for even more john
> options" to the usage output and makes sure this is the last line of
> usage output even for GPU builds.
It's a perfectly sane idea, but we were struggling to shorten the main list. What do others think? Personally I think a luser who doesn't find the hidden options anyway, will probably be better off without them ;-)
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
