|
Message-ID: <fb0c5c9cc9f087067220fbecd5e514a9@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:39:25 +0100 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: Changes to common-opencl.c On 14 Jan, 2013, at 0:14 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote: > Em 13-01-2013 18:36, magnum escreveu: >> Device 1: Tahiti (AMD Radeon HD 7900 Series) > > Commited. Great, I like those little details. It hate having to go to wikipedia to know what a "Loveland" is. >> For parsing, try to follow how --groups are parsed in options.c and getopt.[ch]. It seems the provided functions can do most things we need. I haven't looked at it now but I'd expect some "documentation" within getopt.h. > > I was thinking about creating a function to do something like snipped below. But, seems you meant something else using 'options_main', list_init(), etc. I would prefer to avoid messing with core this way. Could you please clarify? I can have a go at the parsing if you want. I really think we should use the provided getopt stuff if it can help us at all, and in this case it seems it has exactly the functionality needed. Given --device=1,2, what should the parser do? Fill an array somewhere? > BTW: having --device and --devices will disable -de:1 option. Is this ok for everybody? Not sure what you mean. What will be disabled? Due to how getopt works, --device and --devices will really be the exact same option to John (just like you can say -t instead of --test). So you can just as well say --device=1,2 and --devices=3. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.