[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50D1F2CC.8000709@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:01:00 -0200
From: Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Opencl build from binary
Em 18-12-2012 17:39, magnum escreveu:
> From a quick look at opencl_cryptsha512_fmt.c in your repo, I wonder
> why you didn't make more of it shared? The format could just call
> opencl_build_kernel() and the common code could use the binary if
> available, transparent to the format. However, I guess we need some
> kind of version-control. Or is there already? I didn't look very
> closely. It could be like
I tried to do something not invasive in common-opencl. Now one (only if
he wants to use new functionality) have to change source code:
From:
opencl_init("$JOHN/cryptmd5_kernel.cl", ocl_gpu_id, platform_id);
To:
opencl_init_dev(ocl_gpu_id, platform_id);
opencl_build_kernel_save("$JOHN/cryptmd5_kernel.cl", ocl_gpu_id,
magumOptions=NULL, saveBinary=1, warnAboutCompilation=1);
BTW: If needed/wanted, it is easy to create a new function opencl_init_save.
> if (no binary) OR (timestamp of source is newer than timestamp of binary)
> build [and write/overwrite binary]
> else
> use binary
>
> Or is that too simple? I can't think of any problems with that.
Implemented this way. Depending on how many GPUs someone have, one file
for each device name.
Attached and diff here:
https://github.com/magnumripper/JohnTheRipper/pull/135/files
Claudio
Content of type "text/html" skipped
View attachment "0003-Shared-code-to-allow-to-build-and-use-binary-OpenCL-.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (5565 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
