|
Message-ID: <fa79b37f4125b47981bee37da7e1d25d@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:58:55 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: choosing code optimisations On 26 Sep, 2012, at 13:45 , Tavis Ormandy <taviso@...xchg8b.com> wrote: > Hey, just in case anybody else wants to try it with their formats, here is a > quick note on finding low hanging performance wins for gcc. I've been using the > attached script to benchmark different options, it turns out ... That's curious. I'll play a little with it. How many of those are there? Ideally I guess you'd want to test combinations of two or more of these too, but that might end up in a truckload of combinations. > $ ../run/john --test --format=nt > Benchmarking: NT MD4 [128/128 X2 SSE2-16]... DONE > Raw: 37253K c/s real, 37253K c/s virtual > > $ bash ~/chooseopts.sh linux-x86-64-native nt2_fmt_plug.c nt | sort -g | tail Not sure if that was just some kind of cosmetic error in your mail but just FYI, NT (source file NT_fmt_plug.c) is one thing, and nt2 (source file nt2_fmt_plug.c) are completely different implementations of the same format. With today's naming the latter would be called nt-ng I suppose. magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.