[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22f82162f990bc0eabf6d38c155eec01@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:04:03 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: sha512crypt-opencl
On 26 Sep, 2012, at 16:57 , Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com> wrote:
> Em 26-09-2012 02:52, Solar Designer escreveu:
>> Claudio, Gifts -
>>
>> A while ago, atom let us know that his sha512crypt implementation in
>> oclHashcat-plus is "87% faster" than ours on NVIDIA's 560Ti. Gifts has
>> now benchmarked the two on his 560Ti, and at first glance this does not
>> appear to be the case - however, more testing is needed.
> Good to hear.
>
> How about the plans to include/apply the "self-test time impact" solution (by solar) to unstable? The self-test time hurts c/s A LOT.
Yeah maybe I should. I haven't checked if Solar committed them to CVS yet (makes things a tad easier when merging). It will only be to bleeding-jumbo though, because unstable-jumbo is probably a future 1.7.9-jumbo-8. OTOH we *could* merge it to a Jumbo release before Solar does it in a core relase. I usually only do that with important bug fixes.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
