[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1128b75.2728.139dc2af0c0.Webtop.0@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:36:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: jfoug@....net
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: RE: hmac-md5/sha1 in magnum-jumbo (was: 1.7.9-jumbo-7)
This is EXACTLY what I see. A few hashed missed, and then a few hashes
missed with the .pot file is re-run.
I will state this. It is ONLY a few hashes VERY early on. Like in the
first SSE block, or first 2 blocks of SSE. It is the same ones every
time.
I wonder if there was a memset or something missed in init() that later
gets cleaned up, but in that first block run, cause a few items here and
there to miss. NOTE, I have not dug into this (no time), but that is
just an educated 'guess'.
> After fixing the SHA_BUF_SIZ bug in the -fixes branch (which made
> about half of the 1500 fail) and merging that to magnum-jumbo, I now
> probably see the same as you in the latter branch:
>
>
> form=hmac-sha1 guesses: 1497 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:hmac-sha1 guesses: 1493 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>
> form=hmacMD5 guesses: 1498 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
> .pot CHK:hmacMD5 guesses: 1493 time: 0:00:00:00 :
> Expected count(s) (1500) [!!!FAILED!!!]
>
>
> This happened when I introduced clear_keys() in the hmac SSE2 formats.
> We could just revert that but I'm very curious why that fails. It
> might be worth trying to nail it.
>
> magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
