[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ9ii1FZ4782ycv2UWM6cOppRSpBuF0qhqwQ7H2=TPPd5a4Jbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 12:50:25 -0400
From: Matt Weir <cweir@...edu>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Was: Re: [john-users] Cracking Gauss using dynamic
Hey JimF,
I was trying the code you specified in your reply on the john-users
list, (http://www.openwall.com/lists/john-users/2012/08/17/3), and ran
into the following problem:
Error, unknown function:
Func=DynamicFunc__append_from_last_output_to_input2_as_raw
Error parsing section [List.Generic:dynamic_2033]
Error in line 12 file is ./test_dynamic.conf
The actual line in question is:
Func=DynamicFunc__append_from_last_output_to_input2_as_raw
While I see an entry for the function in the doc/DYNAMIC readme, when
I look at the actual code in src/dynamic_parser.c I don't see that
function, (or the similar function of
"DynamicFunc__append_from_last_output2_as_raw")
I've tried copying/pasting the function name several times as well to
try and rule out any typos. This is in JtR 1.7.9-jumbo6.
*Note I'm posting about this in john-dev since it seems like it might
be more of a code issue.
Thanks,
Matt
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 8:16 AM, <jfoug@....net> wrote:
> Dev talk, brought to john-dev. I will make a non-dev follow up on
> john-users.
>
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:06:48AM -0400, Matt Weir wrote:
>> I thought that maybe the implementation of phpass in the dynamic
>> format was generic enough - but it is not. Its loop is hardcoded in
>> DynamicFunc__PHPassCrypt(). So it seems like the current dynamic format
>> is incapable of arbitrary loops. This may be something for JimF to
>> enhance - not for this specific target, but in general.
>
>
> This has been on my 'to figure out' list for several years. I would like to
> add looping, variables, condtional etc. But I just have not gotten down to
> doing this of yet. Currently, dynamic is just an array of function
> pointers, that is run 1 after the other. These function pointers all have
> exactly the same prototype: void fp(void). Then there are a few input
> (working) buffers, length pointers, a matching set of output (crypt)
> buffers, some 'CONST' buffers, a salt, a salt2, a username, and generic
> 'fields' buffers (fields from the input file). That is really all there is
> to dynamic now. Seems overly simplified, but it has allowed most of what we
> do for cracking hashes to be able to be done.
>
> The biggest shortcomings, are:
>
> strange input handling, like byte transposing for the 'crypt'
> md5/sha/sun/..., partial byte usage (like PIX), etc. These are all one-off
> coded.
> lack of simple looping (phpass, crypt* formats)
> lack of variables
> lack of dynamic parsing of variables (sunmd5, php/wordpress, or other
> variable round crypts)
> lack of conditionals (likely fits in with variables).
> lack of a hooking function mechanism (to add 'custom' code). This would be
> needed/usable for things like the coin flip in sunmd5, possibly for handling
> strange inputs, etc. Probably adding specialized hooks for pre-init,
> (post-init also??) and post-crypt would be helpful.
>
> I have thought of things in the past, such as pre-processing (like macro
> expansion in C). This would by things like looping. It would allow for
> 'constant' pre-defined variables (like building phpass that does 2048
> loops). This would be on the easier side of implenting. It would only
> require changes in the code that loads the array of function pointers.
>
> The full 'enhancement' would be a very large undertaking, on an already
> overly complex format.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
