[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120820163945.GA10426@debian>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:39:45 +0400
From: Aleksey Cherepanov <aleksey.4erepanov@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Aleksey's daily status report #13
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 05:13:41PM +0200, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 08/20/2012 03:53 PM, Aleksey Cherepanov wrote:
> > - dependencies (needs qt and john, and does not need anything else)
>
> So if a user intends to use johnny with openwall's john version (either
> official or jumbo), he needs to install the distribution's john package
> anyway.
... or (such advanced) user could install johnny "forcing
dependencies", i.e. saying to installation system to ignore
dependencies.
> May be it is the best way to proceed, because most users of
> johnny will probably not be that familiar with john, and they'll expect
> exactly this behavior.
At this time I think its ok to have john in dependencies. But I do not
know how to proceed later.
Maybe we could make two versions of packages: with and without
dependency on john.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Aleksey Cherepanov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
