[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d68a50d4bbf272c4ac569d7ee2a3d02@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:23:28 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: asan report
On 2012-06-30 11:55, magnum wrote:
> On 2012-06-30 11:50, magnum wrote:
>> On 2012-06-30 10:53, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
>>> So far, I have found out that asan doesn't work with the following formats:
>>>
>>> Target : linux-x86-64-clang-debug
>>>
>>> $ clang --version
>>> clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31)
>>> Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>> Thread model: posix
>>
>> I'm confused. I'm the author of most of these lines but I do not see
>> anything wrong with them.
>
> I think I see now. It's just the self-tests. For example, one self-test
> does:
>
> format->methods.set_key("", index);
>
> I think we should "fix" the self-tests, not the formats. If anything.
Solar, I believe this problem (in case it *is* a problem at all) affects
core too (trip format at least). Do you want to fix it in there or
should we fix it in jumbo only? Or do you think we should just ignore this?
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
