[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <077f1c40952940385d9ca84f59bddb3a@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:46:06 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: committed patches
On 2012-06-25 18:37, Frank Dittrich wrote:
> On 06/25/2012 06:09 PM, magnum wrote:
>> For now, I did not apply the Markov-split-by-percent. I personally think
>> it's too near release and there may be dragons: Apart from the merge
>> problems it will give me (albeit on non-public trees), what happens if
>> you run MPI and use this option? And for that matter, what *should*
>> happen if you do?
>
> As a compromise, don't apply the doc/MARKOV change, but just the source
> code change.
>
> Then, we replace one implementation of undefined/undocumented behavior
> start:end 10%:20% treated as 10:20
> with another one
> start:end 10%:20% treated as percent values instead of absolute values.
>
> So that the brave users get a new feature.
Brave users don't need it, they enjoy the quirky wonders of MPI ;-)
Committed now. Meld is a frigging excellent tool, I did not even get the
merging problems I feared in the contest tree.
I did not drop the docs, we can just as well have it documented. I bet
more people will use this than MPI anyway (doh!).
fead039 Fix linux-x86-64-icc target for HAVE_NSS case (Frank Dittrich)
ed9ee22 Fix --list=? output (new-line/trailing space) (Frank Dittrich)
47def68 Markov: first convert start % value, then end % value (Frank
Dittrich)
2c5a95a Markov: allow start and/or end to be specified in percent (Frank
Dittrich)
I need to fix my icc, but your HAVE_NSS patch can't be wrong.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
