[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP2075A2043A32C5C756760FEFDE10@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 02:22:28 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Use a different format name for raw-sha1-ng, because of max. pw len
15 instead of 55
To let relbench compare an implementation which supports a maximum
password length of 15 with one that supports a maximum password length
of 55 would IMHO not be correct.
That's why, make sure raw-sha1-ng uses a different format name.
ALexander wanted all different implementations of one algorithm to use
different format names - at least for implementations with different
features (like different maximum password length supported) I agree,
With this patch, raw-sha1-ng uses "Raw SHA-1 (pwlen <= 15)" instead of
"Raw SHA-1".
Frank
View attachment "0001-Use-a-different-format-name-for-raw-sha1-ng-due-to-m.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
