[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4dd783bec2c5da6abb69e18a06ef8d4f@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:50:31 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Jumbo candidate vs Test Suite
In this case it's not really needed as this will be the first Jumbo
release with GPU formats in it.
Or did we do more renames? We have the ssha vs salted-sha1 that was up
now in john-users.
magnum
On 2012-06-25 00:44, jfoug wrote:
> In the TS, since it is sort of free form, with multiple 'valid' strings, I can easily have it so both old and new names work. I will try to get this done on Monday.
>
>> From: magnum
>>
>> I just noticed we needed to adopt the TS to the crypt-md5 format renames
>> (pushed now). And I think we still have some bad results for some GPU
>> formats in TS. Will investigate and report.
>>
>> magnum
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
