[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a73464dafdff35a294536f24d9775625@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:36:21 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: "group work size"
On 2012-06-24 21:24, Solar Designer wrote:
> magnum, Lukas, Claudio -
>
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:42PM -0300, Claudio Andr?? wrote:
>> At this moment we are using (and my vote is to keep them):
>> - Local work size (LWS) and global work size (GWS).
>>
>> LWS = work group size
>> GWS = keys per crypt (recently changed)
I prefer to call them local work-size and global work-size. Actually,
global work-size == keys per crypt for non-vectorized formats only. For
a vectorized format it will normally be GWS == keys_per_crypt/4
> It'd be nice to have this corrected today, before we release this stuff
> as part of a -jumbo version for the first time.
I agree. I can do it in a couple of hours unless someone beats be to it.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
