[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120624192453.GA5172@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:24:53 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: "group work size" (was: WPA-PSK fixes, OpenMP support)
magnum, Lukas, Claudio -
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:42PM -0300, Claudio Andr?? wrote:
> At this moment we are using (and my vote is to keep them):
> - Local work size (LWS) and global work size (GWS).
>
> LWS = work group size
> GWS = keys per crypt (recently changed)
>
> Not sure whom use these names on the first time, but they are not only
> here: they are on the OpenCL "way" too.
I was referring to the words "group work size", which many JtR formats
print right now. I think this is a JtR'ism that we need to replace with
a proper OpenCL term. Google web search for "group work size" finds
john-dev postings first, confirming that we're being weird.
It'd be nice to have this corrected today, before we release this stuff
as part of a -jumbo version for the first time.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
