[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0535dffc3d7f96f4a601a73cc4b9b986@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:48:23 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: wordlist dupe suppression
On 2012-06-19 22:29, jfoug wrote:
>> From: magnum [mailto:john.magnum@...hmail.com]
>>
>> On 2012-06-19 21:28, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2012 08:12 PM, jfoug wrote:
>>>> I really dislike the worddupe code, being default. Yes, I can see
>>>> certain benefit from it, but making it default, .....
>>
>> We could make it configurable and default to off. It just beats me why
>> anyone would prefer that.
>
> I have dicts (large ones), that have been properly dupe removed. Why would
> I want to load gb's of data, and have it dupe checked every time I load
> these files??
I will add options. Maybe like this?
Command line option:
--dupe-suppression Suppress dupes in wordlist [regardless of size]
john.conf options (as delivered):
[Options]
# Dupe suppression will be performed if file is smaller than this
WordlistDupeSuppressThreshold = 0
# Same as above, but for closed-loop mode (.pot files)
PotFileDupeSuppressThreshold = 1073741824
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
