[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <021c01cd4e5a$7b1f3b80$715db280$@net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:31:17 -0500
From: "jfoug" <jfoug@....net>
To: <john-dev@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: wordlist dupe suppression
I will look into this. Problem is there is a LOT of people working on the
code right there. I hope my memory was correct on the statement I made. I
did that code several years ago, and wrote that statement from memory, not
from finding the problem in code.
>From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
>
>Jim -
>
>On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:12:06PM -0500, jfoug wrote:
>> I think the buggyness is likely an off by one in the initial
>> computation of line count. I believe that if the file does not end in
>> \n, the line counts are correct. If it ends in a \n, then it is 1
>> larger. This was a work around for a core if there was no trailing \n
>> line (IIRC). The array of line pointers was not large enough. I
>> thought the line count was corrected, after the true load (not the
>> line count check). It looks like the line count check is being used
>> within this part of logging, and to determine if a dupe was found or
>not.
>
>Are you going to correct this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
